In
the Student Personnel Point of View, 1937, we learned that even back then, we
understood that higher education requires the student to not only be educated
academically but to educate the student as a whole beyond the walls of a
classroom. Over the course of the last decade, higher education has lost its
real purpose from educating students to be critical thinkers and leaders of the
workforce to a piece of people that gets you a job. Many of the students I currently work with
are ready to get out of school and find a job the fastest way possible and many
just want the degree for their resume.
Keeling and Hersh (2012), state how the education system is gradating
students that are not fully prepared in the workforce. They believe in the idea
of higher learning the same way as the Student Personal Point of View, in that
education needs to be educating the student as a whole.
Although
I do not think that higher education has completely lost its purpose in the
classroom, where it is failing is helping students think critically and be able
to make that connections that allows them to develop and learn. In Learning Reconsidered (2004), they state
that higher learning needs to be a campus-wide focus, which means that all
stakeholders, students, faculty, administration and staff developed
co-curricular activities that helps students creates meaning (p.1). As I read
the Student Personnel Point of View (1937), I realized that we had started with
the right idea of higher learning but with the changes in the culture,
demographic and economy, higher education became more of a requirement rather
than self-improvement and development.
For the last 5
weeks, I’ve been pondering whether I wasted my time as a undergraduate student
by not taking advantage of every student activity group, campus activity, or
going above and beyond in my class assignments in order to think critically and
be able to connect with my fellow classmates.
In part, I think I did because of my timid personality, work life, and
my eagerness to finish college, but I also felt that the campus as a whole did
not challenge me to go above and beyond to develop as an individual. As future
student affairs professionals, we need to start filling in the gaps where
academics is missing, conduct activities to engage students, develop effective
learning outcomes and build relationships with other departments to change the
campus as a whole. But how do we change a system that has gone so far off the cliff? Education like many other areas of our
society that requires improvement will require many years of debate and
politicians denying that there is nothing wrong with our higher education
system. Sadly for our society and a culture to change, we often either need to
go to an extreme tragic situation, and even then, change is not immediate, or
we take it a step at a time. Like
Keeling and Hersh, we, as student affairs professionals, need to create a
culture of higher learning wherever our careers may take us, one campus at a
time. It may take time, but it does need to begin.
Nice work Cindy. Thanks for sharing.
ReplyDeleteDid you really waste your time? Or use it differently? Now as a CSD pro you have some insight into the un-engaged mindset. Go forth -- Engage!
ReplyDelete